top of page

Election Year HR: What If Parliament Ran on Your Rota?

  • Writer: Sally Scadden
    Sally Scadden
  • May 28, 2025
  • 3 min read

As the UK prepares for a general election, there's one question that no one in HR, Payroll, or Ops is asking — but probably should:

What if Parliament ran like your workplace rota?

Picture it: the Speaker of the House managing the rota spreadsheet, MPs clocking in on biometric terminals, debates scheduled with minimum rest periods between sittings, and shadow cabinet members calling in sick just before PMQs. It’s funny, until you realise it’s a lot more relevant than you might think.

In this blog, we’re using a light-hearted comparison to highlight some serious operational truths. Because when you think about it, the Houses of Parliament have more in common with a modern shift-based business than you'd expect — rotating staff, unpredictable workflows, late-night finishes, and the constant risk of a rogue employee going off-piste.


1. The Rota That Ran the Country

Imagine if the parliamentary whip had to run a legally compliant shift schedule. Would all MPs be getting their 11-hour daily rest and 24 hours off every 7 days? Would debates be rescheduled because the “late finish” from a midnight vote meant everyone had to take a statutory break?

Shift-based businesses already know the consequences of poor scheduling: fatigue, burnout, errors. In Parliament, it just leads to sleepy debates and mysterious disappearing backbenchers. In a care home, it’s a safeguarding risk. The principles of scheduling well — respecting time off, avoiding double shifts, and ensuring adequate cover — are universal.


2. Payroll at the Palace of Westminster

Imagine MPs submitting overtime forms and expense claims through a payroll portal — with alerts for any anomalies. Would some historic travel claims still pass the sniff test?

In real-world Payroll, data accuracy is critical. Overpay someone and you lose money. Underpay them and you lose trust. In political terms? See also: media scandal.

If a Cabinet reshuffle happened mid-pay cycle, how quickly would that change be reflected in your system? If the answer is “we’d need to raise a ticket and wait three days,” you’ve already got more red tape than the actual government.


3. HR Lessons From the Dispatch Box

HR in Westminster would have its work cut out:

  • Grievance handling (see: daily shouting matches across the floor)

  • Conduct investigations (we’ll just leave this one there)

  • Flexible working arrangements for MPs juggling multiple constituencies (plus some side gigs)

Sound familiar? HR professionals already manage similar issues — from complaints and investigations to the complexity of multi-site working. The difference? Your documentation is probably a lot more organised.

Good HR is about clarity, consistency, and fairness. Maybe someone should drop a line to the Procedure Committee.


4. Compliance, But Make It Funny

Parliament has centuries of procedure, but not necessarily compliance. If a backbencher refused to wear PPE in a care home setting, they’d face consequences. In Parliament? It’s “tradition.”

The modern workplace doesn’t have that luxury. Whether it’s GDPR, Working Time Regulations, or safeguarding protocols, compliance isn’t optional — and “we’ve always done it that way” doesn’t wash with an inspector.

Businesses need tools that enforce policy in real time — not just rely on good intentions. If Parliament had real-time alerts for rule breaches, half the sessions would probably be cancelled.


5. Engagement and Turnout: Lessons in Morale

Turnout matters. Whether it’s voters at the ballot box or care staff turning up for a weekend shift, engagement is what keeps the lights on.

Would your team show up to work if they had to sit through 6-hour debates on fisheries legislation every week? Possibly not. But do they feel heard, supported, and fairly treated? That’s what keeps them on the rota.

The same principles apply to voter engagement and employee morale — clarity of purpose, fairness of treatment, and feeling like their contribution matters.


Conclusion: Running a Country vs. Running a Rota

While we’re not seriously suggesting 650 MPs get put on a rota app (though we’re intrigued...), there’s a lot that political life can teach us about operations — and vice versa.

Running a compliant, well-resourced, and fair workplace takes more than policies and hopes. It takes systems, visibility, shared responsibility, and a dash of humour.

So this election year, while the politicians debate who’s best fit to run the country — ask yourself: could they handle your rota?

(And if they could, would they still run for office?)



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page